s/creditos/créditos/

s/Proyecto/proyecto/

s/, y/ y/

s/estan/están/

s/ó/o/

s/ ,/,/

s/ / /

s/ / /

s/ / /

s/Hacer Cambios Persistentes a/Modificaciones persistentes de/

s/ignoren/sustituyan/

s/corre/se ejecuta/

s/Compilando/Compilar/

s/script de shell/guión/
s/el cual puede encontrarse/que se encuentra/

s/script/guión/
s/, la cual/que/

s/alamacenamiento/almacenamiento/

s/script/guión/

s/ al/ en el/

s/Personalizando/Personalizar/
s/NanoBSD./NanoBSD/

s/probablemente sea/es probablemente/
s/ / /

s/ / /
s/insumirá/llevará/

s/forzara/forzará/

s/directoro/directorio/

s/ / /

s/asi/así

s/ / /

s/ / /

s/kernel/núcleo/

s/./:/

s/./:/

s/kernel/núcleo/

s/./:/
s/ / /

s/ / /

s/./:/

s/./:/

s/ / /

s/./:/
s/usara/usará/

s/Verifique/Consulte/

s/Personalizadas/personalizadas/

s/shell/intérprete de comandos/
s/ ././

s/./:/

s/ / /

s/./:/
s/Permitir/Permite/

s/./:/

s/ ,/,/
s/scripts/guiones/

s/Agregando Packages/Añadir paquetes/

s/Pueden agregarse packages/Se pueden añadir paquetes/

s/instalara/instalará/

s/localizados/situados/

s/EJemplo de Archivo de Configuración/Ejemplo de archivo de configuración/

s/es/podría ser/

s/Actualizando/Actualizar/

s/corriendo/en ejecución/

s/de este paso de/entre este paso y/

Why two lines?

s/termino/terminó/
s/habra/habrá/

s/ / /

s/,//

s/ al/ en el/

s/scripts/guiones/

s/desde que partición este corriendo/de la partición desde la que esté ejecutando/

s/De acuerdo con/Según/
s/huesped/huésped/

s/Intente utilizar/Puede utilizar/
s/huesped/huésped/
s/esta/está/
s/corriendo/ejecutando/

s/serivicios/servicios/

s/ó/o

s/huesped/huésped/

s/envie/envíe/

s/Asegurese/Asegúrese/
s/este/esté/

s/huesped/huésped/
s/firewall/cortafuegos/

s/Conectese/Conéctese/
s/huesped/huésped/
s/ / /
s/script/guión/

Yesterday I ran it on the translated document. It pointed out a few errors, though not the repeated words. This last revision is the result of fixing some of those problems.

I deliberately left "ports" and "packages" untranslataded, since this is consistent with the currently translated version of the handbook. I have no strong feelings one way or the other, but if we're going to translate them, then we should probably document it somewhere.

Removing the dashes (—) results in a document that is formatted different than the original. We should leave them as they are.

Translating "script" as "guión" is wrong, since "script" is a technical term, and this is likely to cause confussion.

"Kernel" is a technical term, and I don't think we stand to gain anything from translating it. Most spanish translations of the scientific literature (for example: Tanembaum's book on operating systems) refer to it as "Kernel" and not "Núcleo".

I'm not sure of what poedit did here. It certainly wasn't intentional on my part.

There seems to be something funny going on when I try to fix this. If I edit the .diff file manually (after downloading it from Phabricator) and then try to upload it again with the second line removed it spits out an error.

I have to go back to the original .po file and see what's going on there.

I find this is a similar problem to the translation of Kernel. Though this is a minor example, since users will probably not be able to tell the difference. The vast majority of technical books refer to it as "Firewall".

In addition to that, "guión" doesn't even make sense here.

Is this a problem to you when you apply the patch? Poedit seems to be generating this lines automatically... I don't think they can be removed (at least not manually). It certainly isn't a problem on the generated document, at least for me.