This adds some context behind our reproducible build and NO_ROOT builds.
I am not exactly sure if this is the correct location for mentioning this.
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- R9 FreeBSD doc repository
- Lint
Lint Skipped - Unit
Tests Skipped - Build Status
Buildable 68933 Build 65816: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
| website/content/en/releases/15.0R/relnotes.adoc | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65 | This reads well to me. It looks like you are using a UNICODE character (RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK) in
Do we prefer '? I asked doc committers and will report back. | |
| website/content/en/releases/15.0R/relnotes.adoc | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60 | I think I'd drop "official" in this sentence. It makes more sense where used below. | |
| website/content/en/releases/15.0R/relnotes.adoc | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62–65 | I have made some changes and additions to those lines. | |
| website/content/en/releases/15.0R/relnotes.adoc | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62 | It's really dist sets + pkgbase packages that are fully reproducible -- the ISOs are not necessarily reproducible, in part because they build a version of pkg out of the ports tree without really being controlled. | |
| 66 | I don't believe this is fully true -- makefs's cd9660 support may have some non-reproducibility and I think we put pkg built from ports on most/all of these images also. | |