diff --git a/website/content/en/status/report-2025-10-2025-12/geneve-support.adoc b/website/content/en/status/report-2025-10-2025-12/geneve-support.adoc index f8ff1e055b..a319daa9ad 100644 --- a/website/content/en/status/report-2025-10-2025-12/geneve-support.adoc +++ b/website/content/en/status/report-2025-10-2025-12/geneve-support.adoc @@ -1,29 +1,29 @@ === GENEVE Tunnel Links: + link:https://reviews.freebsd.org/D54172[Add Support for Geneve (RFC8926)] URL: link:https://reviews.freebsd.org/D54172[] Contact: Seyed Pouria Mousavizadeh Tehrani I have been working on GENEVE tunnel implementation for three months and it is now under review. GENEVE creates a generic network virtualization tunnel interface for tenant systems over an L3 (IP/UDP) underlay, providing Layer 2 (ethernet) or Layer 3 services using the GENEVE protocol. Here is what I have done: * Support for unicast and multicast underlay for both IPv4 and IPv6. * Jail support and per-VNET geneve tunnel. * RXCSUM/TXCSUM/TSO offload capabilities. -* Support for inheritence and configuration of ToS, TTL, and DF values. +* Support for inheritance and configuration of ToS, TTL, and DF values. * Support for NETLINK/WITHOUT_NETLINK for if_geneve. * Updated ifconfig to support tunnel creation and modification using NETLINK for if_geneve. * Wrote man page for man:geneve[4] and updated man:ifconfig[8] to include geneve parameters. * Wrote tests. Dependencies and related reviews to support geneve implementation: * Bug fix on netlink dump assignment link:https://reviews.freebsd.org/D54190[D54190] (done) -* Bug fix on netlink credential inheritence link:https://reviews.freebsd.org/D54109[54109] (under review) +* Bug fix on netlink credential inheritance link:https://reviews.freebsd.org/D54109[54109] (under review) * Update ECN tunneling behavior per RFC6040 (required by GENEVE) link:https://reviews.freebsd.org/D53516[53516] (under review) The review is large because I implemented features that are already available on other platforms before submitting. You can help to speed up the process by reviewing and providing feedback on phabricator. diff --git a/website/content/en/status/report-2025-10-2025-12/jdk21default.adoc b/website/content/en/status/report-2025-10-2025-12/jdk21default.adoc index 73af045335..2aa1444a69 100644 --- a/website/content/en/status/report-2025-10-2025-12/jdk21default.adoc +++ b/website/content/en/status/report-2025-10-2025-12/jdk21default.adoc @@ -1,24 +1,24 @@ === Ports -- Make OpenJDK 21 the default JAVA_VERSION Links: link:https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272855[Issue 272855] URL: link:https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272855[] + link:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17hmRQ0ShY4SHHVEkQBVxqK2G88fPZLriTzO26zXdjC4/edit?usp=sharing[Sheet tracking Work in Progress] URL: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17hmRQ0ShY4SHHVEkQBVxqK2G88fPZLriTzO26zXdjC4/edit?usp=sharing Contact: Ronald Klop The default JAVA_VERSION in FreeBSD ports is still OpenJDK 8. It is time to upgrade this to a more modern version like OpenJDK 21. We need to test and fix all ports using Java to build or run with JDK 21, or pin JAVA_VERSION in the port to the latest supported version. The work is being tracked in PR 272855 and a Google Sheet for more details. Already more than half of the ports that failed a test run is fixed. If you have experience with Java and the ports system you are invited to help. I think it is reasonable to have the ports in shape for the JAVA_VERSION=21 setting in February 2026. Plan: * Check the last 12 ports and create a PR or commit -* Commit the PRs that are timeing out on maintainer feedback +* Commit the PRs that are timing out on maintainer feedback * Ask for another exp-run * If done, increase JAVA_VERSION