security/zeek looks good
- Feed Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Feed Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Jun 4 2022
Jun 3 2022
Jun 2 2022
May 28 2022
May 4 2022
Apr 28 2022
Apr 21 2022
Mar 26 2022
Mar 20 2022
Jan 26 2022
Jan 25 2022
Jan 20 2022
Jan 10 2022
Jan 8 2022
Dec 28 2021
Dec 26 2021
Dec 15 2021
Nov 8 2021
Oct 8 2021
Sep 25 2021
Sep 23 2021
Sep 22 2021
Sep 17 2021
Sep 16 2021
Sep 7 2021
Aug 31 2021
Aug 21 2021
Jul 25 2021
Jul 24 2021
Jul 19 2021
Jul 12 2021
Jul 11 2021
Jul 6 2021
Jun 25 2021
Jun 24 2021
Jun 12 2021
Jun 3 2021
Jun 2 2021
May 29 2021
May 22 2021
May 12 2021
May 11 2021
May 10 2021
(My first impression was, "What is this .export sorcery?!?!")
May 6 2021
May 5 2021
zinc 295 # pwd
/usr/ports/devel/avr-gcc
zinc 296 # git status .
On branch main
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/main'.nothing to commit, working tree clean
zinc 298 # fetch -o /tmp/p https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30022/diff
fetch: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30022/diff: size of remote file is not known
/tmp/p 84 kB 609 kBps 00s
zinc 299 # patch < /tmp/p
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...The text leading up to this was:
Index: devel/avr-gcc/Makefile =================================================================== --- devel/avr-gcc/Makefile +++ devel/avr-gcc/Makefile
Patching file Makefile using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 33.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 72.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...The text leading up to this was:
Index: devel/avr-gcc/distinfo =================================================================== --- devel/avr-gcc/distinfo +++ devel/avr-gcc/distinfo
Patching file distinfo using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...The text leading up to this was:
Index: devel/avr-gcc/pkg-plist =================================================================== --- devel/avr-gcc/pkg-plist +++ devel/avr-gcc/pkg-plist
Patching file pkg-plist using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 2.
done
I also uploaded a copy of Makefile.orig
In D30022#676443, @0mp wrote:Hmmm, I don't know why you experience this behavior. I've tested this patch many times both in poudriere and by building the port manually and running qa targets manually. Perhaps I missed something..
May 4 2021
Yeah, the raw diff doesn't apply cleanly for me either. Looking it I think it is against a different version of Makefile than what is currently in the ports tree. The current Makefile:
May 3 2021
In D30022#675433, @joerg wrote:Are there any comments about the patches that don't work straight out of the box for me?
Do you want me to commit it including my modifications?