In D37930#861889, @jlduran_gmail.com wrote:Also failing this test:
% ping -c1 192.0.2.1 PING 192.0.2.1 (192.0.2.1): 56 data bytes Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 --- 192.0.2.1 ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
- Feed Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Feed Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Feed Search
Jan 3 2023
Jan 3 2023
- sbin/ping: Do not show "Request timeout" when -q is specified
- sbin/ping: Fix the timeout message when -c or -l are specified
Jan 2 2023
Jan 2 2023
hrs published D37929: Mk/bsd.sites.mk: Add GH_ASSET to download a release asset on GitHub for review.
hrs added a reviewer for D37927: net/tigervnc-server: Use the same default fp for Xvnc as xorg-server: meta.
hrs requested review of D37927: net/tigervnc-server: Use the same default fp for Xvnc as xorg-server.
Jan 1 2023
Jan 1 2023
Dec 31 2022
Dec 31 2022
Dec 23 2022
Dec 23 2022
In D37493#856006, @t_uemura_macome.co.jp wrote:
- Many changes pointed to by hrs.
- Style(9) changes, some pointed to by takawata.
Dec 1 2022
Dec 1 2022
Nov 30 2022
Nov 30 2022
I put my comments inline. Many of them are style-related, but please fix the memory leak of the sc->res and sc->action queue, at least.
Oct 20 2022
Oct 20 2022
May 7 2022
May 7 2022
May 6 2022
May 6 2022
May 5 2022
May 5 2022
Apr 19 2022
Apr 19 2022
Mar 4 2022
Mar 4 2022
Nov 19 2021
Nov 19 2021
Looks good to me. Thanks for your hard work!
Nov 18 2021
Nov 18 2021
- Please update stf(4) manual page, too.
- I would suggest disabling 6to4 functionality when a braddr is configured. A mixed configuration of 6to4 and 6rd is quite confusing when seeing a result of ifconfig(8) command-line output because the braddr is a parameter for the interface, not a single 6rd domain configuration. I believe no one (except for me) uses the both at the same time.
Sep 4 2021
Sep 4 2021
If you need a second pair of eyes, I say this change looks good.
Aug 28 2021
Aug 28 2021
Aug 27 2021
Aug 27 2021
Aug 25 2021
Aug 25 2021
Replacements by sed can break literal "include" in the adoc source files. Is it always safe?
Aug 24 2021
Aug 24 2021
Aug 23 2021
Aug 23 2021
Jul 4 2021
Jul 4 2021
Jun 21 2021
Jun 21 2021
Jan 28 2021
Jan 28 2021
Jan 19 2021
Jan 19 2021
Jan 13 2021
Jan 13 2021
Looks good to me.
Dec 29 2020
Dec 29 2020
Dec 13 2020
Dec 13 2020