In D48892#1115051, @imp wrote:Any sendmail configs affected?
- Feed Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Feed Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Feed Search
Mar 13 2026
Mar 13 2026
Mar 11 2026
Mar 11 2026
Nov 2 2025
Nov 2 2025
Jul 16 2025
Jul 16 2025
Feb 8 2025
Feb 8 2025
Feb 7 2025
Feb 7 2025
jkoshy added reviewers for D48892: usr.bin/m4: Improve compatibility with GNU m4.: imp, gnn, emaste.
Dec 31 2024
Dec 31 2024
jkoshy updated subscribers of D48271: libelftc: Fix a typo - FreeBSD's riscv port is little-endian..
jkoshy added reviewers for D48271: libelftc: Fix a typo - FreeBSD's riscv port is little-endian.: emaste, gnn.
Feb 20 2024
Feb 20 2024
Sep 26 2023
Sep 26 2023
Aug 24 2023
Aug 24 2023
Aug 20 2023
Aug 20 2023
In D40753#944940, @mhorne wrote:I would like to commit this soon, ideally before the stable/14 branch. @jkoshy any further thoughts?
Aug 9 2023
Aug 9 2023
Aug 3 2023
Aug 3 2023
Aug 2 2023
Aug 2 2023
Quick question: are K7 CPUs no longer supported?
Please consider a rename to 'pmc.amd.k8.3'?
Jul 8 2023
Jul 8 2023
Jul 7 2023
Jul 7 2023
Jun 26 2023
Jun 26 2023
Have you considered translating the older event definitions to JSON form, and dispensing with the __PMC_EVENTS macro?
Jun 20 2023
Jun 20 2023
Jun 16 2023
Jun 16 2023
Jun 14 2023
Jun 14 2023
Please also mention in the commit log that hwpmc(4) no longer supports this CPU model?
Jun 13 2023
Jun 13 2023
Jun 5 2023
Jun 5 2023
Jun 2 2023
Jun 2 2023
May 31 2023
May 31 2023
May 30 2023
May 30 2023
May 26 2023
May 26 2023
May 12 2023
May 12 2023
May 5 2023
May 5 2023
May 3 2023
May 3 2023
Was support for these CPUs ever implemented?
Thanks for the clean up.
FYI, the pm_id field in a struct pmc contains the CPU and 'row index' for the PMC, so we could potentially drop the cpu and ri fields in a future change.
May 2 2023
May 2 2023
One thing I am trying to be more considerate of when it comes to section 9
pages is "how can this page be discovered?" In other words, is it cross-referenced
from another man page or is it referenced anywhere in the source code? I do not
think there are any obvious candidates which should reference kstack_contains(9)
in their SEE ALSO, but pointing to the man page at the kstack_contains() definitions
might help the reader learn that the page exists at all. Just something to consider,
I am not asking you to do anything specific here.
Addressed a review comment.
Address a review comment.
Addressed review comments.
Addressed review comments.
Apr 20 2023
Apr 20 2023
Apr 18 2023
Apr 18 2023
Apr 10 2023
Apr 10 2023
Apr 5 2023
Apr 5 2023