User Details
User Details
- User Since
- Oct 21 2020, 11:39 PM (284 w, 2 h)
Sep 26 2024
Sep 26 2024
Sep 26 2023
Sep 26 2023
Jan 20 2023
Jan 20 2023
As it stands, the clause represents a layering violation, so it should go. But is that enough? It seems that the entire document requires reworking. We have similar wording for Apache licenses, for example. Can we get input (read: work) from the doc team?
Apr 14 2022
Apr 14 2022
Apr 13 2022
Apr 13 2022
Mar 31 2022
Mar 31 2022
Mar 30 2022
Mar 30 2022
Mar 28 2022
Mar 28 2022
Mar 23 2022
Mar 23 2022
Dec 13 2020
Dec 13 2020
grog committed R9:af25585d8811: Typo.