In D5603#121843, @emaste wrote:

It calculates the number of bits which change after repeating the same measurement (e.g. of a shared library load address) in a loop. Can you explain how that produces an incorrect result for the patch in this review?

In D5603#120030, @emaste wrote:

My comment is based only on the term ASLR having been used generically for some time to refer to many related implementations. For better or worse I think absent a specific phrase like "PaX ASLR" there is no conclusion to be drawn about the nature of the implementation.

Anyway, the naming (and descriptions) of these sysctls is a relatively inconsequential point for consideration later on if or when the patch in this review is ready to be committed.