I'm ambivalent on this. I agree with the broad rationale here.

use unknown

Again, fix building outside of poudriere. When git is present, skopeo build fails.

a better comment

TLDR don't run golangci-lint as part of the build.

yup, thanks for the bump.

2 small things, fix these & you're good to commit IMO:

🐐

✅ tested against oci container no-toolchain image

✅ tested against oci container no-toolchain set

Trim commit msg

thanks! I'm find with devd, it was the sound/bt stuff that was unexpected.

remove FreeBSD-bhyve, in the expectation that these packages
would no longer appear in the list.

Thanks Igor; this fixes the ports issue you investigated. 🚢 it!

EDIT: it's probably FreeBSD-bhyve, so I'll drop that for the moment.

moving this to a new review, the history is confusing.

use minimal-jail in no-toolchain

I've done a manual diff of minimal-jail vs what we had in no-toolchain.

FreeBSD-caroot is in both minimal,minimal-jail package sets atm & that
seems (from a non-OCI jail perspective) to be the right thing to do.

LGTM. I will add these to wiki for possible ALPHA4 inclusion.

abandoned in favour of Lexi's awesome pkg sets! https://reviews.freebsd.org/D52716

LGTM here. I failed to get thermite to run at all, but the only change should be to amend:

failed to build from sources here:

From Colin via IRC, "can we exclude FreeBSD-lldb on riscv64`.
I will look into using package sets this week while at eurobsdcon, that may be a better solution.

Use new, new, notoolchain name. YOLO!

I could not find a good word that means "not-quite-full excluding toolchain".

Jan's list of packages he excludes

I'm very confused about pkgbase -dev packages.

actually use what dfr@ proposed in his comment.

pick some arbitrary names - no-compiler and full.

@acm thanks your patch handles the web bits already? awesome :-) I'd suggested to @hayzam_gmail.com that he could generate those
directly as part of his own release process.

add acm@ patch to prepare and bundle npm assets