User Details
- User Since
- Jan 26 2018, 10:31 AM (417 w, 15 h)
Fri, Jan 16
Thu, Jan 15
Hmm…not sold on this either.
This is not an outright rejection, but rather would like to see the meld test suite in action first. They have still not released anything apart from the odd-numbered development release series.
Thu, Jan 8
remove typing-extensions from RUN_DEPENDS, only needed for < 3.10
Wed, Jan 7
- rebase
- use ${PY_TOMLI} shorthand and remove Python < 3.10 stuff
Tue, Jan 6
fix botched rebase
- update to 9.2.2
Mon, Jan 5
Sun, Jan 4
Sat, Jan 3
Fri, Dec 26
Dec 24 2025
Dec 20 2025
Dec 19 2025
Dec 18 2025
Dec 10 2025
Dec 9 2025
Dec 5 2025
No longer immediately relevant after the revert. Worth discussing the venn diagram regarding __ISO_C_VISIBLE et al since there are gotchas in C as well.
Dec 4 2025
revert to initial diff
use __STDC_VERSION__ to ensure visibility only on C23 and later
Dec 3 2025
There shouldn't be C23-compliant codebases that define their own unreachable(). Based on my understanding of sys/sys/_visible.h, it looks like __ISO_C_VISIBLE is getting defined as 2023 almost unconditionally, at least in base, so it leaked into jemalloc. It may leak into other C codebases if a standard is not explicitly passed or other macros defined during build steps.
Dec 2 2025
Nov 29 2025
Nov 27 2025
Nov 26 2025
Nov 25 2025
Nov 20 2025
Nov 19 2025
Nov 18 2025
Nov 11 2025
Nov 7 2025
Nov 4 2025
Nov 2 2025
Nov 1 2025
sync reference to libuuid
- lang/python313: update to 3.13.9